Celtics Bench and Fourth Quarter Struggles
Watching the Celtics-Lakers game from Saturday, it was painfully obvious from the start and it really hit home by the end.
The Celtics bench is bad. At least on the offensive end.
Yes, you know this already. Fair enough. I type these words in part because I admit that even a fully health Celtics team may not reach the conference finals, let alone the NBA Finals. Sure, Walker, Smart, and Pritchard will get healthy again. But I think we all agree that even a healthy Celtics squad is probably enough to win.
I also write this because we’re watching a depleted Celtics lose a bunch of winnable games. It’s painful. Inconsistent play, injuries, and lineup and rotation continuity are all factors for the ups and downs through the first 20 games. Bench play is a big issue too and I’ve wondered how big this issue is.
I’ve re-watched the fourth quarter of the last three games, specifically focusing on the opening of the quarter. A few reasons for looking at the problem through this lens. First, the lineup to start the fourth quarter is generally a Tatum and the Bench lineup. Second, when it comes to the final stanza, the Celts usually have a lead or are trailing in a one possession game. Yes, the bench has been on the floor for large leads and deficits in the middle two quarters. See the last four games as acknowledgement. But the Celts have found a way to overcome bad play and hang on to a lead by the end of the third.
The problem is the fourth. Just throwing this out there, but ideally, you’d want to start out the fourth quarter with a few quick buckets to solidify or retake your lead. The Celts seem to do the opposite of this, forcing them to either get hot or scramble the remainder of the fourth quarter to pull out a win.
This Celtics problem dawned on me during the fourth quarter of the Spurs game. I focused on the Celtics offensive possessions during the first 3-4 minutes of the fourth quarter of the last three games(Lakers, Warriors, Kings). This is more eye test than advanced analytics. Someday I’ll get into more analytics, I promise. But for now, here’s some observations I had during the past three games.
Celtics vs Lakers, 1/30/21
End of Q3 Score: 78-71
Celts 4th Quarter Lineup: Tatum, Smart, Teague, Thompson, and Ojeleye
Offensive Possessions(game time listed is when Celtics began possession):
- 11:44: Tatum stripped on a pick and roll with Rob Williams, 8 seconds left on the shot clock
- 11:24: Tatum iso and missed turnaround jumper from 20 feet, 6 left on the shot clock
- 10:51: Teague drive and missed floater, 16 left on the shot clock
- 10:28: Nesmith turnover, out of bounds on a 3-point attempt
Comment: The Lakers scored eight in a row, capped off by a Talen Horton-Tucker layup, which gave them a 79-78 lead. It took the Celtics over three minutes to score a single basket, a Jeff Teague layup. They scored seven points in the first seven minutes of the fourth quarter. They also had seven turnovers in those same seven minutes. Is that bad? Seems bad?
The Marcus Smart injury occurred with 10:28 left and Aaron Nesmith subbed in for the next two minutes. The Celtics wouldn’t go on to do much offensively until the final five minutes in the game.
Celtics vs Warriors, 2/2/21
End of Q3 Score: 86-85, Celtics
Celts 4th Quarter Lineup: Tatum, Teague, Thompson, G. Williams, Green
Offensive Possessions(game time listed is when Celtics began possession):
- 11:45: Tatum fadeaway miss with the shot clock winding down
- 11:23 Teague misses a contested 3 after a G. Williams offensive board
- 11:07: Teague gets a breakaway off a steal, but has the layup blocked
- 10:53: Tatum iso – makes a step back 3
- 9:49: Teague misses an awkward and contested 17-footer
- 9:34: Thompson get the offensive rebound and Tatum misses a step back 3
- 9:12: Thompson makes a bucket in the paint; Celts take a 91-90 lead
- 8:34(tie game): Turnover – Thompson and G. Williams run a hi-lo; Williams can’t corral the Thompson’s pass from the top of the key
Comment: After this possession, Golden State hit a bucket to take the lead. The Celts promptly turn the ball over again on a 3-second call. In looking at the previous possessions, the ball movement was a little better. We also see a couple of iso plays, one turnover(an improvement from the Lakers game), and too many Jeff Teague shots.
Celtics vs Kings, 2/3/21
End of Q3 Score: 82-81, Celtics
Celts 4th Quarter Lineup: Tatum, Ojeleye, G. Williams, R. Williams, Waters
Offensive Possessions(game time listed is when Celtics began possession):
- 11:35: Waters three from the wing with 12 on the shot clock
- 11:06: Tatum iso in a Sacramento zone – R. Williams with the putback on a Tatum missed layup
- 10:14: Waters fouled on the drive, 1-2 from the free throw line
- 9:54: Waters misses a quick three with 17 on the shot clock
- 9:14: Waters makes a floater of a PnR after a series of side-to-side ball movement
- 8:32: Second chance points off a R. Williams dunk; Tatum initially missed a floater
Comment: Having Rob Williams start the quarter with this group may have been a blessing. The Celts scored 7 points with 4 of them being second chance points, all thanks to Rob Williams. The downfall is not much ball movement except for one possession. And a lot of Tremont Waters shooting. The same Tremont Waters who’s shooting 26% on the season.
Observations
The Celts start the fourth quarter offensively as inconsistent at best and not particularly good at worst. Tatum at times will try to take over, as he should, with varying degrees of success. It’s a lot of isolation or the two-man game. Not a lot of passing. When Tatum drives to the basket, he’s settling for floaters. No finishes at the rim and he’s not drawing fouls either. Tatum needs to take advantage of his size and get to the rim. It’s also clear Tatum needs another weapon to help space the floor and put the ball in the basket.
Who, from this roster, you ask? Well, definitely not Jeff Teague or Tremont Waters. I give Tremont Waters credit for drawing a foul on a layup in the Kings game. As the second to last guy on the roster, he must hit his free throws. Hitting 83% for the season(small sample), he made 1 of 2. Both players have the propensity to take shots early in the shot clock too. Waters took two three in that fourth quarter start during the Kings game. One was at 12 seconds; the other at 17. I’m sure Brad Stevens would tell you he’s not happy with the lack of ball movement. However, with Smart and Pritchard on the injured list, I’m not sure what more the Celtics can do with their guards.
Tristan Thompson has played much better over the past few nights and Rob Williams was awesome in last night’s game against the Kings. One of these two should be on the floor to start the fourth. Having a good offensive rebounder to keep possessions alive is a must for this group.
What about the Wings? Well, that’s the issue. Semi Ojeleye’s shooting 30% from 3 over his last ten games, which is regressing to the norm after a hot start. Grant Williams is now 9 of 18 over his last ten games from 3. The problem is he’s had his struggles on both ends of the floor, excluding his three-point shooting prowess. On the surface, it sems like the Celtics miss Marcus Smart and Payton Pritchard. But even Marcus Smart is shooting 39% from the field on the season, including 31% from three. It’s not a lock these fourth quarter starts would be better with a healthy squad.
I prefer to be in the solutions business and I’m at a loss other than the obvious: the TPE. The Celtics need a scorer with size. Those are Danny Ainge’s words, as he told the Toucher and Rich radio program. Harrison Barnes, Nikola Vucevic, and Serge Ibaka were names thrown about in Celtics twitter today. Feels like Barnes and Ibaka would be more likely than Vucevic. All would be upgrades to what they have. That’s what they’re missing though – reliable scoring off the bench. Until they find it, Jayson Tatum will continue to see double teams and teams will force the likes of Semi, Grant, Teague, Waters, and Carsen Edwards to beat them. Lots of luck.
And that’s the frustration of this Celtics team. Jaylen Brown has made a huge leap; many predict he’ll be an All-Star this year. Jayson Tatum is Jayson Tatum. The surrounding pieces have been okay in spurts, but overall, they haven’t been good enough. Daniel Theis has seemed good on the offensive end in the past 2-3 weeks. Rob Williams and Payton Pritchard have been pleasant surprises in short spurts. But that’s not enough. At a minimum, the Celtics need a healthy squad and Kemba Walker playing at an All-Star level, even if he’s the third option on this team. With Tatum and Brown taking the next step in each of their careers, it’s time to find them the supporting cast they need. For now, expect more double digit blown leads, slow fourth quarter starts, and frantic finishes. Exciting, frustrating, and taking years off our lives.
The word to describe the Celtics beginning of fourth quarter offense is the same word you can use to describe the remainder of the Celtics first half season: Survival.
Defending Xander Bogaerts
Why is Xander Bogaerts projected to hit sixth? Is John Farrell crazy? The answers, in order, are I don’t know and I hope not.
Yes, Xander Bogaerts hit third in the lineup yesterday against the Orioles. That was also in a lineup not including Betts and Benintendi. And it was only one game.
Right now, it looks like John Farrell will start the season with a 2-6 of Betts, Benintendi, Ramirez, Moreland, and Bogaerts. Much of this is the alternating righty-lefty combo. I’m sure some of this is due to Bogaerts end of 2016 slump. But is Mitch Moreland is the answer? This is a guy who has never scored more than 60 runs and never had an OBP higher than .330 in the five seasons of 350+ plate appearances.
Meanwhile, Xander Bogaerts OBP the last two seasons has been .355 and .356 respectively. His run totals the last three years have skyrocketed from 60 to 114. Obviously, Bogaerts spent a lot of time at the top of the order last year, giving him more opportunities to get on base and score. But he also scores runs because he will get on base an additional 4 to 5% more than Moreland.
Moreland’s slugging percentage is about 30 points higher, but the 2016 home runs totals are nearly identical. OPS and OPS+ are also nearly identical. Is this enough to warrant Xander Bogaerts hitting sixth?
No it’s not. It’s arguable that Bogaerts should bat second, third, or fourth. But that’s for another blog post. Right now, batting Bogaerts in front of Moreland is a no-brainer.
The good news is we’re less than a week away from seeing this grand experiment begin.
Thoughts on Speeding Up Baseball
Remember what Clint Eastwood’s Dirty Harry character said about opinions? Well, I won’t print it here. But you can google it and get the point.
In the wake of baseball’s new intentional walk rule, it seems like everyone has an opinion on how to speed up baseball. In last Sunday’s Boston Globe baseball column, Nick Cafardo shared opinions from nine anonymous major leaguers (link attached).
Some thoughts were very outside of the box, which was the point. Like everything else in life, baseball will need to evolve or it risks becoming a niche sport(see, NHL). I’m more of a baseball purist. To me, I love the game and wouldn’t change much. But if MLB is trying to grow its business, concessions will need to be made.
I’m sure I’ll have a few thoughts throughout the season on what concessions to make. For today, I’ll point out two concessions that won’t be made.
Reducing time between innings – Not going to happen. Commercials, and in turn, media, help pay the bills for media companies. The same media companies that are signing massive national and local rights deals. Owners like money, media companies like money, and advertisers like money. So the media companies will sell whatever advertising they can to help support the large rights deals they just paid.
Reducing the season – Whether it’s 8 games or one less month, neither will happen. And for the same reason I wrote above. Money. According to a 2016 GOBankingRates study of MLB stadium prices, the average cost for two people to spend a day at the ballpark is just under $80. I’m going to use round numbers for the sake of efficiency and say $40/person.
We’re going to assume a plan of reducing the season by 8 games(4 home games per team). Not a lot, but at least the World Series can be completed in October. On the lower end of the spectrum, an MLB park has a capacity of 40,000 people. So here’s what’s lost by asking teams to give up 4 home games per year:
- 160,000 fans not attending baseball games (40,000 x 4)
- $6,400,000 not being spent at the ballpark
- In the case of the Dodgers, with the largest stadium capacity, you’re looking at $9M
So by reducing the season, we’re asking teams to get rid of one Anthony Rizzo, Jason Hammel, or Travis Wood. Sorry for all the 2016 Cubs World Series champs references. But you get the point. Not happening.
I do appreciate the recommendations and outside the box thoughts for helping baseball evolve. Asking owners and players to give up money to make us fans feel better is off the table. I challenge baseball fans everywhere to think more critically when looking for solutions to help continue baseball’s success.